destruct

destruct allows for case analysis on inductive terms or assumptions. It can be used to split assumptions with conjunctions and disjunctions, as well as existential assumptions. The arguments of destruct are patterns.

Syntax

(* Simple usage *)
destruct H.

(* Destruct a term and introduce a hypothesis E showing its equivalence to the form it took *)
destruct n eqn:E.

(* Providing names for newly-introduced terms *)
destruct H as [H0 [H1 H2]].

(* Providing only some names for newly-introduced terms *)
destruct H as [H0 [? H1]].

(* Destructing multiple terms/hypotheses *)
destruct x as [| x0 x1], H as [[H1 H0] H2].

(* Providing names for newly-introduced terms in different generated subgoals *)
destruct H as [H1 | H2].

Examples

Before

n: nat
-------------------------
n = 0 \/ 1 <= n

destruct n as [| n'] eqn:E.

After (first goal generated)

n: nat
E: n = 0
-------------------------
1/2
0 = 0 \/ 1 <= 0

After (second goal generated)

n, n': nat
E: n = S n'
-------------------------
1/1
S n' = 0 \/ 1 <= S n'

Script

Theorem destruct_example1 : forall n : nat,
    n = 0 \/ 1 <= n.
Proof.
    intros. destruct n as [| n'] eqn:E.
    - left. reflexivity.
    - right. apply le_n_S, le_0_n.
Qed.

Script

Theorem destruct_example2 : forall (P Q R : Prop),
    ((P /\ Q) /\ R) -> P /\ (Q /\ R).
Proof.
    intros P Q R H.
    destruct H as [[PTrue QTrue] RTrue]. split.
    - apply PTrue.
    - split. 
        -- apply QTrue.
        -- apply RTrue.
Qed.

Script

Theorem destruct_example3 : 
    forall (P Q R : Prop),
    (P \/ Q) -> P \/ Q \/ R.
Proof.
    intros. destruct H as [PTrue | QTrue].
    - left. assumption.
    - right. left. assumption.
Qed. 

Resources

Reference Documentation

---