Home |
Github |
Typically the first tactics a Coq user ever utilizes.
intros
finds assumptions builtin to your goal (usually in
the form of a forall
quantifier) and moves them to the
goal’s context (a.k.a. hypothesis space, assumption space). This is
similar to the first step of many informal, paper proofs, when the
prover states “let there be some number n, …”
More specifically, intros
specializes a goal by looking
for type
inhabitation and proposition assumptions and moving them into the
assumption space. For example, if you write
forall (n : nat), n + 0 = n
, the forall
is
acting as an assumption that there is a value of type nat
that we can call n
. Calling intros
here will
provide you an assumption n
that there is a value of type
nat
.
intros
will not introduce variables that are contained
in opaque/wrapped definitions - unless an explicit name is
provided for them.
A simpler tactic, intro
, acts similarly but can only
introduce one assumption, and will introduce variables contained in
opaque/wrapped definitions.
(* Simple usage - introduces all named assumptions *)
intros.
(* Give specific names to assumptions as you introduce *)
intros n m x.
(* Split a conjunction or existential assumption upon introducing *)
intros [A B].
Before
=========================
forall (n : nat), n + 0 = n
intros x.
After
x: nat
=========================
1/1
x + 0 = x
Before
=========================
forall (A B C : Prop), A /\ B -> C -> A /\ C
intros A B C [ATrue BTrue].
After
A, B, C: Prop
ATrue: A
BTrue: B
=========================
1/1
C -> A /\ C
Before (assume P := forall (n : nat), n = n
)
=========================
1/1
P
intros.
After
=========================
1/1
P
Alternatively,
intro.
After
n: nat
=========================
1/1
n = n